Structure built to hold.Not builtto sell.
SPV formation, ownership architecture, and independent financial challenge before capital is committed.
Structure the ownership.
Then challenge the numbers.
Most financial advisors do one or the other. We do both, and the combination is what protects capital when a deal is well-structured but the underlying numbers are wrong, or vice versa.
Ownership architecture that holds under scrutiny, from HMRC, lenders, and at exit.
Tax-efficient structures that work. Not structures designed to look efficient at the point of sale, structures designed to perform across the life of the investment, through lender reviews, HMRC enquiries, and ultimately at exit.
The most expensive structure is often the one that seemed cheapest to set up. We design ownership frameworks with one priority: they must hold under real-world pressure, not just perform on a spreadsheet prepared for a client who wants to proceed.
- SPV formation and structuring
- Holding company architecture
- Intercompany loan structures
- Capital deployment planning
- Exit planning and restructuring
Before capital is committed, the numbers should be independently challenged.
The financial model behind a deal is usually prepared by someone who wants it to proceed. Vendors are optimistic. Agents are motivated. Even advisors working for the buyer are sometimes reluctant to kill a deal they helped to originate.
We have no commercial interest in whether a deal proceeds. Our interest is in whether the financial logic is sound. If it is not, we say so clearly and provide the evidence. If it is, you proceed with independent confidence that the numbers have been properly challenged.
- Pre-acquisition financial review
- Independent number challenge
- Development finance scrutiny
- Refinancing analysis
- Management accounts review
First.
We check the numbers
behind the deal, before
the deal checks you.
Most capital losses in property and care investment happen not because of market conditions, but because the financial logic of the deal was flawed from the outset. Assumptions were not tested. Numbers were not independently reviewed. The deal was well-structured but the underlying business case was wrong.
Independent deal scrutiny is not pessimism. It is the standard of rigour that professional capital deployment demands.
We bring the same methodology to deal scrutiny that we apply to expert witness analysis, evidence first, conclusion second. If the numbers stack up, we will tell you that clearly. If they do not, you will know before the capital is committed, not after.
Request Deal Scrutiny →The full scope of what
we provide.
Other practice areas you may need.
When Should a Property Portfolio Move Into a Corporate (SPV) Structure?
The decision points that justify moving a UK property portfolio into a corporate or SPV structure, the reliefs that make it possible, and the costs that catch landlords out.
How Owner-Managed Businesses Lose £50k+ a Year Through Structural Tax Inefficiency
The structural tax decisions that quietly cost owner-managed UK businesses tens of thousands a year, and how to identify them before HMRC settles a position you cannot reverse.
Business Asset Disposal Relief: How to Plan Two Years Before Exit
How owner-managers protect Business Asset Disposal Relief eligibility well before exit, and the structural decisions that quietly disqualify a sale from the 14% rate.
Whether it's tax, CFO
or strategic finance.
Whether you are seeking tax optimisation, CFO advisory or strategic finance support, we respond promptly and work with precision. No junior gatekeepers. You speak directly to Bharat Varsani FCCA.
19-21 Westfield Lane
Harrow, London HA3 9ED